Senator Kelly Ayotte

Senator Kelly Ayotte

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Sam Bourne, Michael Holman and KingCast see how Senator Kelly Ayotte's contemptible back room legal games are played out in Madison.... and beyond.

Note and 1 June 2011 update: 
Attorney Cullen and Sam Bourne exhange emails with the KingCaster after the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Mr. Bourne's case. Read it here.

Note: Attorney Cullen and I had an email exchange over this one, read it in the comments.

Note: Appellant Bourne's Pleadings will be posted over the weekend at this links, for now check out the Preamble to his Reply Memo on top of this journal entry. The nerve of high-powered government and corporate attorneys, they think they can get away with anything.... only because they too often do get away with everything. Welcome to America, the Home of the Brave.

1.  Appellate Brief
2.  Reply Memorandum
SENATOR AYOTTE’S OFFICE – Susan Terzakis from Senator Kelly Ayotte’s Office was scheduled to be in attendance to introduce the Selectmen to the resources within the Senator’s Office.  Unfortunately she had to return unexpectedly to her office before the scheduled meeting time.  A future appointment may be scheduled.  In the meantime, Terzakis spoke with the Town Hall staff this afternoon and offered to provide information on resources and contacts to help the Town and its residents. 

Why is Kelly Ayotte making overtures on 19 April 2011 to the Selectmen in the Town of Madison as a U.S. Senator? Stay tuned I'll tell you in a minute.

Fact: Kelly Ayotte ignored forgeries and wire fraud when I was a licensed title insurance producer.

Fact: Kelly Ayotte ignored falsified statements and Unconstitutional conduct in Michael Holman's case in which Madison Police Chief John Pickering worked with a host of NH legal and political hacks to take Mr. Holman's children away from him in Washington State and bring them back to their crack-addicted mother where they faced unlawful sexual overtures and one of them sustained a concussion and a coma as a direct and proximate result of the mother's wanton negligence. See the KingCast movie, above.

Fact: Kelly Ayotte ignored forgeries and false documents in Bourne v. Town of Madison NH Dist. 2005-CV-365, in which Pickering was also involved. She also ignored a falsified Notary of Witness to a Deed by town Attorney Randall Cooper. 

Basically the Town completely lied to this guy relative to a development property, then forged documents and admitted to changing the appearance of certain maps, it's all tied to whether there were Class VI roads to the property and whether the town had authority over the area, long story and up on appeal. But as the Federal case was brewing Brian Cullen -- seen below and one of my opposing counsels in KingCast v. Ayotte, GOP and Nashua PDNH Dist 2010-CV-501 -- illegally refused to offer up discovery emails per court order and his client was found in contempt. It was raw gamesmanship to keep Mr. Bourne from producing those documents in the Stateside case, which he won anyway but it would have added to his case. Moreover, come to find out that even then Cullen and his clients failed to produce all of the ordered emails from people like Robert D. King.

And to top it off, Pickering got the services of a forced-retirement, very shady, DNA evidence-destroying guy ex FBI guy named Alan Robillard for free, then made a referral to Ayotte because he was having a hard time getting any action there. So now comes Miss Kelly, as a U.S. Senator, back to help clean up the mess because there is ongoing litigation in the First Circuit Court of Appeals, Case no. 2010-17-18.

So hell no I don't trust any of these cats in my case, particularly when you see that Kelly had her other cronies defending my case and the Judge having worked under and with said cronies at McLane, Graf not even divulging that information during a TRO hearing in which she illogically made every possible factual inference against me. See the KingCast Motion for Recusal and this week's short film on that matter:


  1. In response to "what are they feeding these guys, Brian?"



    Nice bit adding the Bourne case to the blog, except that it’s inaccurate and probably defamatory: despite Mr. Bourne’s conviction that there are additional documents, there actually aren’t any. Might note that while he won his land-use case in the superior court, he was denied attorney fees in the state case, which demonstrated that the court agreed the Town acted in good faith. That ruling was affirmed on appeal.

    I didn’t have any part in the land-use case, but have defended the town on four other actions brought by Mr. Bourne. We won summary judgment on all counts of his first federal case, won dismissal of his two subsequent state court actions, and have a pending motion to dismiss and application for fees in his latest federal court action. Several of these cases have included rulings confirming that there was no misconduct in the handling of the discovery and have rejected Mr. Bourne’s ongoing conspiracy claims.


    Brian J.S. Cullen, Esq.
    CullenCollimore pllc
    10 East Pearl Street
    Nashua, NH 03060

    This email may constitute privileged attorney client communication or attorney work product. If received in error, please notify sender and destroy all copies.


    From: Christopher King []
    Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 4:40 AM
    To: Brian Cullen; Christopher King
    Subject: What are they feeding those guys?

    Christopher King to Brian
    show details 8:30 AM (0 minutes ago)
    Seems more like a can of hate to me.

    I have duly noted your response to both the Ridley post and to the Bourne post and will continue to do so each and every time I mention it, in the interests of fairness.

    As for NH (or any other courts) slamming Plaintiffs and not awarding attorney fees, welcome to the U.S.A. circa 2011........ the Judiciary is largely put there to help enforce the police state and to protect the government and far too often, big business.

    Enjoy the day Brian, I know it is a bit unusual to see that strange orangy orb in the sky, I heard it is called "the sun" or something or other.


  2. Whether or not he had any role in it, I notice he was silent on what happened to Michael Holman.

    That fiasco was, and is, simply inexcusable.

    Same way that what they did to Ralph Holder was simply inexcusable.

    And not to mention Dave Coltin.

    The State of NH will use children as an excuse to get you into the criminal system quicker than you can say "abuse of discretion" take your money and slam you when you protest, even while your children sustain neglect and abuse in a bad home.

    It's all part of the prison industrial complex, a spinoff of the industrial military complex. Having been part of it as a state attorney sometimes I feel like I need to repent, that's why I come here.