I told you in FBI post #1 and in the follow-up FBI post #2 from Saturday that we're not taking any prisoners here. We will be at the FBI office. We will be at Nashua Aldermanic Chamber meetings. We will be anywhere and everywhere we need to be in order to expose the culture of corruption and police abuse that has run rampant at Nashua Police Department. You can't treat lawful citizens this way and you certainly can't lie about their actions in an attempt to railroad them into accepting a criminal plea to curb a Federal Monell claim.
Also RSA 91-A: Dear Attorney Cullen -- Please have your client immediately produce a copy of the 2002/3/4 complaint that I issued against a certain Detective, thank you. Meanwhile you can ponder the fact that I don't hate LE. As you know full well, I was an LE Attorney, I play tennis with Boston LE who teach tennis to children and I authored the NAACP letter seen below (looking for it, believe me it exists and it is quite kind). No Sir, I like LE in general, but that bad actors..... I'm going to give them holy hell, as is my First Amendment Right. As to the availability of the videos at least one court has spoken rather eloquently on the matter, and that court cited multiple courts from multiple other jurisdictions that all say the conduct does not violate wiretap laws so it is long past time for Nashua PD to provide those tapes. If you think you can convince a local Judge to rule otherwise go for it when I sue your client and we can make Nashua the laughing stock of First Amendment Law for the entire Country.
KingCast v. Nashua PD RSA 91A Warning Letter - Mike Gannon 2006 Home Videotapes of LE Misconduct
Now then on to the Sam Bourne comments.....
show details 4:36 PM (2 hours ago)
subject Re: Final RSA 91-A warning + Nashua Cops harass reporter at car crash scene + more lies about Mike Gannon.
You sent me your response regarding some other case.
From my experience with you Mr. Cullen, it appears you are assisting another client with the continued wilful concealment of evidence relevant to that litigation at hand. No surprise, your doing it again. See Feld's case NH (2002).
show details 5:46 PM (1 hour ago)
First: Just because I may have received Cc emails, does not give rise to knowing all the facts regarding that case.
But, when there is further evidence of you assisting all of your clients to conceal evidence, it is no surprise.
Sooner or later that type of conduct will come back to haunt you, as you will be caught red handed, and as such, you may be disbarred, or properly sanctioned.
Only time will tell.
But as soon as I can prove you are assisting your Madison clients of concealing evidence, you know first hand I won't sit idle.