Senator Kelly Ayotte

Senator Kelly Ayotte

Saturday, September 29, 2012

KingCast asks: Is YouTube censoring the Civil Rights channel of a former state attorney?

As noted in yesterday's journal entry showing how Michael Holman is shaming Connecticut DCF for putting his children in harm's way with a drug-addicted mother with an extensive criminal history, I have a hard time understanding why I cannot upload videos to my primary channel.  As such, I conducted some Lexis research and located some of YouTube's primary counsel to engage them in open discussion about the matter such that we could determine the issues. Excerpt: 
I post a lot of movies about foreclosure fraud that is crippling this Country (at Mortgage Movies Journal). Many of my 500,000 views come from those movies, showing my testimony before the NH House Committee on Redress and Grievances as well as face-to-face inquiry with foreclosure attorneys and sometimes even a judge or two. It is safe to say that there is no other YouTube channel like it, and it must be protected.  
I value the First Amendment more than all others because it is what I call the gateway Amendment: You need it in order to exercise all the others. To the extent that a private corporation serves as assistant talisman in this process it has an obligation to be fair and impartial beyond the ordinary “terms of the contract” issues. Think of it as Hudgens v. NLRB (424 U.S. 507 1974) in the air, if you will. 
Prior to law school I edited the Ohio Call & Post and wrote for the Indianapolis Star. I was a First Amendment scholar at a top-50 law school, where I wrote substantial portions of a successful Supreme Court First Amendment appeal in State v Lessin, 67 Ohio St. 3d 487 (1993) I recently used the power of YouTube video to advocate for my mother to receive her Title XIX Medicaid benefits in Connecticut, where her nursing home and members of a statewide nursing home providers association have directly congratulated me on my advocacy........ Frankly I am quite certain I “piss off” a lot of bankers, judges and some of corporate America, which is all the more reason why your client, as the largest publicly-accessed shopping mall in the World, must endeavor to protect my channel, which is appropriately named: Save the First Amendment.
Now who knows, it could be a glitch, but it sure would be an oddly-selective glitch, going across two browsers, i.e. Google Chrome and Safari...... meanwhile just a bit more about what I do that merits First Amendment protection from the son of fire victim Robert Taylor:

Robert Taylor Law

Friday, September 28, 2012

Video: Michael Holman slams Connecticut DCF - but YouTube upload button broken for KingCast65 (503,000 views)... but not for KingCast Franconia (49 views) how 'bout them banners?

I have a short film I am trying to upload showing how Michael Holman debunked each and every false allegation against him made by Connecticut DCF. They had found him to be guilty of child neglect after he reported issues of child neglect by the drug addict mother who got custody of his children in NH. NH AG Kelly Ayotte looked on while eight (8) squad cars took the children from his beautiful home in the Washington State and brought them back to the mother, who allowed one of them to ride a bike without a helmet (she had never even bought one) and he wound up IN A COMA. Kelly Ayotte, now a U.S. Senator, had the power to intervene yet did nothing as these children were taken from a good black man and given to a drug-addled white woman. 

Mr. Holman would later discover her criminal history, including a crashed car and a drug raid at the house that the courts and DCF covered up. He is keeping his cool for certain, because a lesser man would have taken a criminal route and then he would be blamed for everything, that's how the system works almost every time because the woman is basically a ward of the State. More on that later but at least some responsible NH State Reps at the Committee for Redress and Grievances are helping out.
So this week at his appeal hearing DCF testified that he had kidnapped his children and was domestically violent. He slammed them but good, with a letter from the mother authorizing him to take the children to Canada, and he pointed out the fact that he has never even been charged with Domestic Violence, much less convicted. Meanwhile the mother's sister had worked for the courts in Meriden, CT where Wendy (the mother) now resides and they won't even put his issues on the docket. This whole thing is so damn corrupt it stinks to high hell.

It is also interesting whatever is going on with YouTube... now I have no more custom thumbnail application and no recognition using my KingCast Franconia account.... hell including this one, there's only two videos there and 49 video views compared to 503,000!

Sunday, September 16, 2012

KingCast sees Wisconsin Judge Juan B. Colas reappear, this time he does the right thing for the First Amendment in voiding Scott Walker's labor laws... earlier he allowed a fraudulent foreclosure to proceed without proof of Standing.

Note: For good measure I threw in the Recall Scott Walker video showing how his office ran a man right out of town when he came to question his foreclosure. They didn't want to talk to him at all, and kept trying to separate us, an act that dovetails with Walker's attempts to ban cameras in the Statehouse. As you can see, I'm not having any of that nonsense, he is a public servant, I am a reporter with experience as a closing attorney/title insurance producer and the Truth will be told, right here at Mortgage Movies Journal.

He's baaaack.... and thank god he actually protected the First Amendment in Wisconsin's raging union battle in a crushing blow to the Republicans who are now trumpeting big bank puppets like Senator Kelly Ayotte. Here is the actual Opinion, and here is the dirt on Juan B. Colas and Anchor Bank, who got receivership without ever demonstrating a showing of Standing requisite to any legal foreclosure case, as determined in Wisconsin Appellate Court in Aurora v. Carlsen, followed by Aurora v. Weisbaum, below the fold. 
Although Aurora's vice president averred in conclusory fashion that Aurora became holder of the mortgage which is the subject of the action "by delivery without a written assignment," the affiant failed to give any factual de-tail of a physical delivery of both the consoli-dated note and the CEMA to Aurora prior to the commencement of the action. Thus, Aurora failed to establish its standing to commence the action. 

Sooooo.... if you haven't sold off the note can I see it?

Sunday, September 9, 2012

KingCast says Judge Jacqueline Hatch is even worse on women than Senator and former NH AG Kelly Ayotte when it comes to sexual assault.

As a former Assistant AG I thought that Kelly Ayotte was bad for giving bad cop Fred Hoysradt a pass when he was drinking Captain & Coke and sexually assaulted Elizabeth Dinan at about 6:45 of this movie. Not to mention Bruce McKay's ex wife filing a TRO and moving to a safe house as she gave birth to their daughter, after he also stuck a "penis-shaped knife" towards a woman's privates for no lawful reason on a busted DUI case. This man is a hero to Kelly Ayotte. Sadly, and apparently not to be outdone.... Ian Millhiser's ThinkProgress feature reveals the following: 

Last summer, a drunk Arizona police officer named Robb Gary Evans drove himself to a bar, flashed his badge to avoid paying cover at the door, and then walked up behind a woman, put his hand up her skirt, and ran his fingers over her genitals. A jury convicted him of sexual abuse, a felony with a maximum sentence of 2 and a half years in prison, and Evans was fired from the police force after an internal investigation. Nevertheless, Arizona trial Judge Jacqueline Hatch, who was appointed to the bench by Gov. Jan Brewer (R-AZ), decided that Evans’ actions did not warrant jail time — sentencing him probation and 100 hours of community service. Evans also will not have to register as a sex offender. Yet, while Judge Hatch apparently did not view the disgraced former cop’s actions as particularly serious, she had some very harsh words for the woman he assaulted: 

Bad things can happen in bars, Hatch told the victim, adding that other people might be more intoxicated than she was. “If you wouldn’t have been there that night, none of this would have happened to you,” Hatch said. Hatch told the victim and the defendant that no one would be happy with the sentence she gave, but that finding an appropriate sentence was her duty. “I hope you look at what you’ve been through and try to take something positive out of it,” Hatch said to the victim in court. “You learned a lesson about friendship and you learned a lesson about vulnerability.”

If only we could teach more judges and police about Civil Rights and Common Sense.

Saturday, September 1, 2012

KingCast says the full moon on the vineyard has Court officials looking strange and acting funny as they join Lowell, MA police in child abuse/custody coverup, using SJC 1:19 as subterfuge.

Yesterday I posted a new video showing Martha's Vineyard-Edgartown District Court personnel violate SJC 1:19 as they continually failed to produce an audio transcript to a father who is proving that his wife issued material lies about him sexually abusing his children and striking her. I sent notice of this video to Candidate Campatelli, who has offered to befriend my friend Clifford Pisano, but who has in reality done nothing for him; I just checked in with him.
Note the FB reaction from Patty Campatelli, who is running for a Court position in Suffolk County and Probate Court:
She told me to fuck off -- but just last week she liked me posting about corruption and petrol prices. The pictures don't lie folks, but apparently she will once she is in office if she supports this kind of hostility toward the press.  She also faux befriended Clifford Pisano, asked him a bunch a questions and did nothing for him. Apparently this is how Massachusetts Court officials operate, corruption and hostility to the free press rule the day. Patently pathetic. 

But is it true or has she been hacked? The image here was provided to me by BostonCab, clearly it doesn't read as if Candidate Campatelli authored it but even if she didn't Lucy she has some 'splainin to do.....Whoa. I am hereby asking her to formally explain all of this. Check here for more info by BostonCab.

This movie and journal entry does not have anything to do with Kelly Ayotte per se but it does show the sort of family court issues that she and her lackeys foment in NH as noted hereinbelow. Instead what it shows is that I don't suffer fools gladly and that I know exactly what the hell I am talking about when it comes to the First Amendment because if I was wrong they would have arrested me on the spot. They knew better but thought they could intimidate me. To hell with that noise.

Look at the hate in his eyes, refusing to give me his name.
And he was wrong on the Law to boot.
Corruption runs deep in Massachusetts
What a jackass.
Here is Journal entry and Movie #1, and Journal entry and movie #2 in the series showing the Lowell, MA police department arbitrarily and capriciously denying Mr. Coleman the right to file a complaint about his wife's friend improperly touching their children. The Assistant DA calls on the phone and does nothing and knows nothing. The green-card wife clearly lied repeatedly on issues of whether she filed bogus complaints of sexual abuse, or whether Mr. Coleman struck her as you listen to her courtroom testimony. And for the coup de gras, yesterday after an entire summer of requests and two visits with Yours Truly, they finally gave him a restraining order audio in his favor where he put forth several salient points against her, but even then it is nonfunctional because it cuts out during his portion and cuts to another case. 

Not to mention the redneck who tries to give me the bum's rush "why don't you just leave, you are not registered under SJC 119," he says.

"Because I don't have to," I said. "The new SJC 119 hasn't even taken effect yet." What a jackass this guy is. By the way I pre-registered about a year ago and notified the SJC in person that I would be registering when it became possible. They were supposed to notify me when it was possible, but did not. At any rate I confirmed with them yesterday that the rule has not yet taken effect anyway so once again I was right, as you will see as I shamed a Suffolk County clerk in Movie #2 link supra. Here is a March, 2012 journal entry about it and here is the friggin' Rule read it for yourself, implementation was delayed. 

It is a Good Thing I know what the hell I am doing, having won First Amendment criminal trials (also seen in Movie #2) because the ACLU runs away from this specific issue like the plauge, and there are a bunch of haters out here who love to try to talk trash and to circumscribe my First Amendment Rights as a reporter to gather and to disseminate news. I am not having any parts of that nonsense however, as I resolutely tell this jackass. I call him jackass because he would not give me his name. I know his name though, but if it is not important enough for him to give it to me then I will call him jackass, fair enough. Movie #3 should be playing at a desktop near you by high noon today.