Friday, February 15, 2013
KingCast tells President Obama: "Keep following your encrypted searches to see KingCast v. Ayotte, NH GOP & Nashua PD is going to SCOTUS, and that NH GOP press wonk Ryan Williams is indeed a fascist pig"
It might not be the White House this time... because the IP addy does not reflect it whereas at other times it did say Oval Office.... but it is someone on the Hill....Video forthcoming, but you can see in the links on the jump page what the White House was reading and watching. In point of fact, the top video is from the first link. As you can see it is from my pre-DSLR days but you can clearly see that I was already invited into a Joe Arpaio/Kelly Ayotte "Steak Out" dinner in Nashua, NH but then was thrown out, with Ryan Williams telling me "You are not a journalist," fascinating. I am also posting my Memorandum in Opposition to Appellee's Motion to Strike and for Sanctions in KingCast v. Ayotte et al. First Circuit Court of Appeals 12-1891.And in the movie I will also address more government officials acting badly, as Defendant Roderick Bremby and his staff and his lawyers -- including CT AG have been caught red-handed: They lied about the timeliness of our mother's Title XIX application for Medicaid benefits and their own Affidavits show the lie. But the Connecticut District Court Judge Alvin Thompson has been giving the Defendants everything they want. It is always tough for the little people in Court, even if you are a former government attorney. Perhaps especially if you are a former government attorney, they don't like defectors too much, ahem. Comcast Cable (126.96.36.199) [Label IP Address]
Thursday, February 7, 2013
Nashua PD, Ayotte, GOP try for sanctions in KingCast Ayotte Appeal to cover their own dirt in First Circuit Case No. 12-1891
Same day service.
Have a nice day and remember: Regardless of what happens in this Court, the dirt you sling will continue to come back to bite you. When you live an honest life, with honest clients, you have no fear. The Court would not let me file a reply this evening, so that will happen tomorrow my friend. Here's an excerpt:
"In any event, Plaintiff-Appellant was compelled to bring this attention to the Court and the related filing was sealed. And that’s still not yet all: Despite counsel’s implications that Plaintiff-Appellant does not know how to comport himself before this Court, in recent history, counsel for Nashua Defendants and/or his client were found in contempt of Court because they don’t want bad information to come out. This happened in case no 1:05-CV-00365, infra."
II. LAW AND ARGUMENT
First of all, there is no citation to case law whatsoever in Appellee’s Motion. That’s because it is ridiculous to start with. The Brief does NOT exceed the word limitation, and that is all that matters. In point of fact, the Corrected Brief actually contains the word count from the first Brief, which is too high. Either way, Counsel for Defendant should pay closer attention to the rules before complaining.......